<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Alex Ruiz&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alexruiz.developerblogs.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alexruiz.developerblogs.com</link>
	<description>Having Fun with Java!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:19:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Android Studio: our new, shiny Android IDE by Joe</title>
		<link>http://alexruiz.developerblogs.com/?p=2700&#038;cpage=1#comment-124840</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexruiz.developerblogs.com/?p=2700#comment-124840</guid>
		<description>I work in a Java dev shop for more than a decade and we evaluated various Java IDEs. IDEA was the first preffered IDE. Because of lack open source edition at that time, we ended up going with Netbeans. Eclipse never worked for me. It was fine for small adhoc type projects. When you have 100s of thousands of lines of code, Eclipse is pain to use. It puts the burden of project dependencies on each developer.  Poor project management system in Eclipse is the main culprit. I always felt Eclipse was built by folks who never used an IDE.
I am glad smart folks at Google finally realized this and fixing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work in a Java dev shop for more than a decade and we evaluated various Java IDEs. IDEA was the first preffered IDE. Because of lack open source edition at that time, we ended up going with Netbeans. Eclipse never worked for me. It was fine for small adhoc type projects. When you have 100s of thousands of lines of code, Eclipse is pain to use. It puts the burden of project dependencies on each developer.  Poor project management system in Eclipse is the main culprit. I always felt Eclipse was built by folks who never used an IDE.<br />
I am glad smart folks at Google finally realized this and fixing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Android Studio: our new, shiny Android IDE by Android Studio: Googleの新しく、輝かしいAndroid IDE &#124; サムライズム #Samuraism</title>
		<link>http://alexruiz.developerblogs.com/?p=2700&#038;cpage=1#comment-124754</link>
		<dc:creator>Android Studio: Googleの新しく、輝かしいAndroid IDE &#124; サムライズム #Samuraism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 05:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexruiz.developerblogs.com/?p=2700#comment-124754</guid>
		<description>[...] 本エントリはGoogleのAndroidチームのソフトウェアエンジニア、Alex Ruizさんのブログエントリを翻訳したものです。 翻訳版の公開を快諾いただきましたAlex [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 本エントリはGoogleのAndroidチームのソフトウェアエンジニア、Alex Ruizさんのブログエントリを翻訳したものです。 翻訳版の公開を快諾いただきましたAlex [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My contribution to Eclipse CDT: external-tool-based code checkers by Some good resource for CDT development &#124; zhongyinzhang</title>
		<link>http://alexruiz.developerblogs.com/?p=2231&#038;cpage=1#comment-124563</link>
		<dc:creator>Some good resource for CDT development &#124; zhongyinzhang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexruiz.developerblogs.com/?p=2231#comment-124563</guid>
		<description>[...] My contribution to Eclipse CDT: external-tool-based code checkers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My contribution to Eclipse CDT: external-tool-based code checkers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My contribution to Eclipse CDT: external-tool-based code checkers by Integrate an external code checker into Eclipse CDT &#124; zhongyinzhang</title>
		<link>http://alexruiz.developerblogs.com/?p=2231&#038;cpage=1#comment-124562</link>
		<dc:creator>Integrate an external code checker into Eclipse CDT &#124; zhongyinzhang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexruiz.developerblogs.com/?p=2231#comment-124562</guid>
		<description>[...] My contribution to Eclipse CDT: external-tool-based code checkers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My contribution to Eclipse CDT: external-tool-based code checkers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Android Studio: our new, shiny Android IDE by Alex Ruiz</title>
		<link>http://alexruiz.developerblogs.com/?p=2700&#038;cpage=1#comment-124541</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Ruiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexruiz.developerblogs.com/?p=2700#comment-124541</guid>
		<description>Absolutely! To me, the main benefit of working with the JetBrains folks, besides IntelliJ&#039;s well-thought architecture and clean code, is the JetBrains folks themselves. Any change that we needed in their platform was implemented in a matter of hours, if not minutes. Questions and bug fixes were addressed right away. This kind of support allowed us to move really fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely! To me, the main benefit of working with the JetBrains folks, besides IntelliJ&#8217;s well-thought architecture and clean code, is the JetBrains folks themselves. Any change that we needed in their platform was implemented in a matter of hours, if not minutes. Questions and bug fixes were addressed right away. This kind of support allowed us to move really fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Android Studio: our new, shiny Android IDE by Dmitry Jemerov</title>
		<link>http://alexruiz.developerblogs.com/?p=2700&#038;cpage=1#comment-124539</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry Jemerov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexruiz.developerblogs.com/?p=2700#comment-124539</guid>
		<description>Android Studio built under the umbrella of Eclipse already exists, and is called ADT for Eclipse.

The dark theme is part of IntelliJ Platform; it&#039;s not something that the Android team at Google worked on. If someone wants to reimplement it for Eclipse, they&#039;re welcome to do so (and I think Fabio Zadrozny plans to work on it as part of his LiClipse project), but I don&#039;t see how this has anything to do with Android Studio.

And I guess a key difference is that JetBrains is able to implement the changes Google needs in a short timeframe and without asking Google to lend a hand with the platform development. Which lets Google focus on developing the Android plugin specifically, not improving the underlying platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Android Studio built under the umbrella of Eclipse already exists, and is called ADT for Eclipse.</p>
<p>The dark theme is part of IntelliJ Platform; it&#8217;s not something that the Android team at Google worked on. If someone wants to reimplement it for Eclipse, they&#8217;re welcome to do so (and I think Fabio Zadrozny plans to work on it as part of his LiClipse project), but I don&#8217;t see how this has anything to do with Android Studio.</p>
<p>And I guess a key difference is that JetBrains is able to implement the changes Google needs in a short timeframe and without asking Google to lend a hand with the platform development. Which lets Google focus on developing the Android plugin specifically, not improving the underlying platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Android Studio: our new, shiny Android IDE by Dmitry Jemerov</title>
		<link>http://alexruiz.developerblogs.com/?p=2700&#038;cpage=1#comment-124538</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry Jemerov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexruiz.developerblogs.com/?p=2700#comment-124538</guid>
		<description>Scott,
As Alex mentioned, the compilation in Android Studio is entirely driven by Gradle. So the degree to which it will be incremental, and the speed of the edit-build-deploy-test cycle, is entirely determined by the feature set of Gradle, not Eclipse or IntelliJ. And for non-Gradle-based projects, recent versions of IntelliJ IDEA do fully support incremental on-the-fly compilation. 

As for the window dressing - well, if you say that, then I&#039;d say that most of the features of Eclipse and IntelliJ are unnecessary. You can do everything in Notepad, after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,<br />
As Alex mentioned, the compilation in Android Studio is entirely driven by Gradle. So the degree to which it will be incremental, and the speed of the edit-build-deploy-test cycle, is entirely determined by the feature set of Gradle, not Eclipse or IntelliJ. And for non-Gradle-based projects, recent versions of IntelliJ IDEA do fully support incremental on-the-fly compilation. </p>
<p>As for the window dressing &#8211; well, if you say that, then I&#8217;d say that most of the features of Eclipse and IntelliJ are unnecessary. You can do everything in Notepad, after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Android Studio: our new, shiny Android IDE by Alex Ruiz</title>
		<link>http://alexruiz.developerblogs.com/?p=2700&#038;cpage=1#comment-124495</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Ruiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 03:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexruiz.developerblogs.com/?p=2700#comment-124495</guid>
		<description>I appreciate your concern, Erdal. I can take care of myself pretty well, thanks :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate your concern, Erdal. I can take care of myself pretty well, thanks :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Android Studio: our new, shiny Android IDE by Alex Ruiz</title>
		<link>http://alexruiz.developerblogs.com/?p=2700&#038;cpage=1#comment-124486</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Ruiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexruiz.developerblogs.com/?p=2700#comment-124486</guid>
		<description>Gunnar, I hear you. I appreciate your good intentions. I&#039;d suggest you to check with the Eclipse folks if such conversations ever happened. They may have happened before you and me got involved.

Peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gunnar, I hear you. I appreciate your good intentions. I&#8217;d suggest you to check with the Eclipse folks if such conversations ever happened. They may have happened before you and me got involved.</p>
<p>Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Android Studio: our new, shiny Android IDE by Gunnar</title>
		<link>http://alexruiz.developerblogs.com/?p=2700&#038;cpage=1#comment-124484</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunnar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexruiz.developerblogs.com/?p=2700#comment-124484</guid>
		<description>Alex, seriously, did the Android SDK team at Google entered Bugzillas at all? 

It sounds like you never did for JDT. That&#039;s certainly not how Eclipse (and to some extend Open Source) works. You can&#039;t complain and celebrate a switch without letting developers/committers know about your issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, seriously, did the Android SDK team at Google entered Bugzillas at all? </p>
<p>It sounds like you never did for JDT. That&#8217;s certainly not how Eclipse (and to some extend Open Source) works. You can&#8217;t complain and celebrate a switch without letting developers/committers know about your issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
